Why I'm Not Raising
Bootstrapping, staying independent
My inbox has three emails from VCs this week.
"Love what you're building. Would love to chat."
I haven't replied to any of them.
The conversation I keep having
Friends think I'm crazy. "31 products? Solo? You need money. You need a team."
They're probably right. Objectively, raising makes sense. More money means more developers means faster shipping means better odds.
But every time I start drafting a pitch deck, I close the laptop and go back to coding.
Something about it feels wrong.
What taking money actually means
Let's say I raise $2M at a $10M valuation. Standard seed round.
Now I have investors. They don't invest for fun—they invest for returns. 10x minimum. That means I need to build a $100M+ company or the investment "failed."
Suddenly every decision filters through "does this grow fast enough?"
Self-hosted first? "Hmm, SaaS has better margins."
MCP focus? "That's too niche. Go broader."
31 products? "Focus on one. Nail it. Then expand."
They might be right! But they might not be. And once you take money, you don't get to find out your way.
What I'd lose
Time to think. VCs want updates. Board meetings. Investor dinners. That's time not spent building.
Freedom to fail. Some of my 31 products will fail. That's fine—I'll kill them and move on. With investors, every pivot is a conversation. Every failure is a data point against you.
The long game. Some of the best companies took 10 years to find their groove. VC timelines are 5-7 years max. After that, you're a "zombie investment" and they want out.
My sanity. I've seen funded founders. The stress is different. It's not "will this work?" It's "will this work fast enough to justify the valuation?" That's a heavier weight.
What I have instead
Savings. About 18 months of runway if I'm careful.
Skills. 13 years of building software. I'm not learning on the job.
Tools. Claude, GitHub Copilot, AI that multiplies my output by 3-5x. One person today ships like a small team five years ago.
Patience. I can build for years without showing hockey-stick growth. Nobody's checking my MRR charts.
The exception
There's one scenario where I'd take money: strategic value beyond the check.
A partner who opens doors I can't open alone. Distribution that would take years to build organically. Technical expertise I'm genuinely missing.
Money plus leverage? Interesting.
Money alone? Pass.
I haven't found that partner yet. Maybe I won't. That's okay.
The real reason
Here's what it comes down to: I spent 13 years building other people's visions.
Picap's vision. Symplifica's vision. ROEPA's vision. I was good at it. I got promoted. I made decent money.
But it was never mine.
Brainz Lab is mine. The weird ideas, the ambitious scope, the "that'll never work" bets—they're all mine.
I'm not ready to hand that over. Not for $2M. Not yet.
Maybe I'm being stubborn. Maybe I'll regret it. But right now, sitting in my apartment in Bogotá, writing code at midnight, I feel more alive than I have in years.
That's worth more than a seed round.
— Andres